한국간호과학회

  • 홈
  • 학술지
  • ANR (Asian Nursing Research)

ANR (Asian Nursing Research)

년도별 ‘권’과 ‘호’를 선택해 주세요 (ISSN 1598-2874(38권 4호까지), ISSN 2005-3673(38권 5호부터)

본문
제목 The Indonesian Version of the Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale: Cross-cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Testing
저자 : Arif R. Hakim; Shan-Tair Wang; Fransiskus X. Widiantoro; Mujib Hannan; Chi-Jane Wang; Suzan J. Fetzer 게시일 : 2020년 12월 페이지 : p300~p305
저자 Arif R. Hakim; Shan-Tair Wang; Fransiskus X. Widiantoro; Mujib Hannan; Chi-Jane Wang; Suzan J. Fetzer 게시일 2020년 12월 페이지 p300~p305 인쇄
파일 the indonesian version.pdf
키워드 factor analysis, statistical; psychometrics; self efficacy; translating; validation study
Purposes: The study aimed to translate the Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale (ESES) into Indonesian and test
the cultural equivalence, reliability, and validity of the new version for university students.
Methods: The cross-sectional study recruited 379 Indonesian university students using convenience
sampling. Phase 1, a culturally appropriate version of the ESES was developed in the Indonesian language.
Phase 2, the psychometric properties were determined through exploratory factor analysis,
bootstrap factor analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis. The internal consistency reliability was tested
using Cronbach's a, whereas the stability using intraclass correlation coefficient to assess.
Results: The students' ages ranged from 17 to 39 years, and 65.0% were women. For translation equivalence,
the mean item content validity indexes ranged from 3.5 to 4, and all items were understandable.
The 16-item scale exhibited cross-cultural appropriateness and readability, with a three-factor model
explaining 62.3% of the variance in exercise self-efficacy. A bootstrap analysis using 100 resamples
further confirmed the three-factor model. The indices of the good-fit model that used the three-factor by
two-stage least squares method were satisfactory, with c2/df = 3.3, goodness of fit index = .88, and root
mean-square error of approximation = .05 (p < .001). The Cronbach's a was .78, .80, and .92 for factors 1,
2, and 3, respectively. The test–retest reliability was demonstrated with an intraclass correlation coefficient
of .91, indicating adequate measurement stability.
Conclusion: The 16-item ESES-I has acceptable validity and reliability; however, a broader application of
the scale requires further testing in different populations to confirm its external validity.